Just change out of a jar, they are not going to be no S proofs. Just normal circulation coins.
Looks like it has been subjected to some sort of acid, just damaged.
There are several genuine error experts who regularly post here. You can get there advice absolutely free, if they say to send it in then you can...
Nope, sorry. Wear and tear on the first, the second one looks like zinc rot. This is where the zinc is exposed through the copper plating and...
As others have stated, just badly damaged. No errors.
No, just seeing a well used coin with years of circulation damage. Nice coin to keep though.
I would say the original poster's coin is Ag-3 at the highest. That is one well worn Indian cent!
Looks like a bit of glue or something similar.
All damage, the rims are raised from hammering around the edge. This also reduced the diameter.
Damaged and cleaned, not high grade. I see no sign of it being a doubled die either. Always nice to find wheat cents though.
Just damage, it looks as though it was soldered to something.
No, just normal cents.
Perfectly normal 1982 D small date zinc, it is the copper one that is valuable.
If any coin dealer thought that is genuine then they are not very knowledgeable. It is a fake, and not even a good one.
Damaged, I would say. Either heat or pounded with something.
It's a fake and not a very good one. Letters are misshapen and uneven, surfaces just aren't right. Some of these can be deceptive but not this one.
Agreed with NLL, very harshly cleaned. Only would have been worth a few cents before, but if it had been valuable the cleaning would have really...
You are correct!
That is not 5.7 it is 5.07, big difference. 5.07 is perfectly normal.
Somebody really gouged that one.
Separate names with a comma.
