That's right, it's fine with me, too, LOL. thanks Rusty
OK, [IMG] [IMG]
my WAG is 66; no marks that I can see and I'll take your word on the luster.
Thanks, I'm really glad you have saved those stories, look forward to reading them.
Fascinating collection, Lord M; look forward to seeing more.
I agree with the 1-B attribution, there are only 4 reverse dies paired with that obv. and the other 3 are easily ruled out. In his book, Bowers...
a very neat piece,Lord M. and a striking coincidence. What is the probability of coming across a LT with one's own initials on it? Sort of...
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Quite a few coins with problems are deemed "market acceptable.' I believe there is a good amount of "silent net grading" going on too.
Er, I don't exactly recall the grade but am pretty sure it's a Fine
[IMG] [IMG]
Nice bust half, great CircCam look and crust.
I'll guess 35. nice patina
That is a very interesting piece and full of obscure symbolism. thanks for posting it.
Paddy, you are a wealth of information when it comes to half dimes. Keep posting my friend.
good for NGC for calling it right as AU58. I would not be surprised if that coin were cracked out and resubmitted it would garner an MS grade at...
congrats on the grade, a choice example!
there appears to be a W scratched into the rev. above ONE> so it looks like AU details to me.
So it looks like the market has spoken.
Well, I'm shocked. Usually "machine damage" means the coin went through a counting machine and the rubber coated wheels put some striations...
Separate names with a comma.