Nice looking trade dolllar with original surfaces. I have a couple myself. [IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG]
Looks like some significant wear to me, so I will guess a bit lower at 45. that being said, I really like the patina and subltle tone on this...
welcome to the forum, halves offer a lot of coin for the money, I think, and the variety of designs over the years makes them very interesting....
very bright and no "skin" so dipped. While very little wear I see much less luster on the obv than I would expect, leading me to think it has...
I agree the Morgan is fake. the date is very puffy/mushy as are most of the obv. letters. overall surface has a grainy look to it. I lean...
Bman, have your checked the auction prices realized at pcgs? eBay? Heritage? Look I don't like to be blunt and maybe I just had a long day but...
I'm thinking 45 ish.
65ish
before seeing the slab photo.. I thought 64. the "luster photos" helped. very nice looking cwt.
I'm terrible at grading from photos. WAG 64.
I have, an 1806 quarter with some barely visible graffiti on the rev, and an 1878-cc trade dollar with some light pin scratches where someone...
My guess before seeing the reveal was 45, but I could see it in an AU holder.
I don't collect much copper,but I don't see any signs of a cleaning . The scratch is the only limiting factor. Having it in a "genuine" holder...
I like it, but has some env. damage or corrosion.
Looks genuine to me.
The trade dollar is an obvious fake. The stone mtn doesn't look to promising either.
Thanks for taking the time to read it. Anybody who wants to post photos of fake trade dollars there is welcome to do so. The more data the better.
the date is the giveaway. the rest is toxic icing on the putrid cake. If you want to learn more about trade dollar fakes try this thread I...
Looks nice 'n frosty!
My first reaction was, that cow sure has a long snaky tongue!
Separate names with a comma.
