An interesting coin I am sure is AT. Too bad for the purist because it looks like that was a nice coin based on the reverse. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
63. Luster seems to be lacking.
I cannot tell for sure, but I think I am seeing wear. But that could easily be your pictures. Regardless, it is ms unless there is some wear....
I don't think the 18-D deserved the 65 and I really don't think the 17-D only deserved a 62. With that strike, a 63 would not have shocked me,...
Both 64's
I guess 64. A bunch of dies cracks!
I got 5 sets. For some strange reason, they are all Lincolns.
Over 10 months, but yes, I enjoyed his comments also.
My guess is PCGS said they were not full bands even though I voted yes. I do not see why else this would be posted.
Believe me you are far from the first or only to outbid me!
I would have to guess VG. Anyone for VG-11?
You out bid me on that one.
XF40, but 45 definitely would not surprise me.
VF25, but those dies had seen better days.
1. 1916- 63RB 2. 1917-S 64 BN 3. 1960- LD questionable color 4. 1962- PR65 RB 5. 1909- VDB 64RB (a 65 would not surprise me)
VF-20
Something about that coin says cabinet wear. MS62?
Problem is most of them are not worth messing with. I gave a bunch to ANACS this weekend (at a coin show). I doubt any were "worth slabbing",...
I have no idea what PCGS is seeing here. This coin looks just like a normal woody to me. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.