Maybe that was it, but it was not quite what I expected. I all I know is this post
What happened to Matt's Picture? I was expecting a good laugh from that one.
It could be MS, but I would guess AU.
Not a sole went that low on 1 and 2. Not even Doug.
MS-62
63. Too many ticky tacks to go any higher
AU-58
64
All are large dates. See http://www.lincolncentresource.com/smalldates/1970Ssmalldate.html
Do you need anything more than this? http://www.ldrcoins.com/ BTW, you are now up to 3 post today!
64, 63, 65 (maybe)
AU-53/55
Is the one on the left counterfeit?
Significantly Not As Described
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
yes!
I have a problem with #2. Why didn't you get me some of the same?
MS64, but those pictures leave a lot of room for variance.
I will go with the xf40
Separate names with a comma.