Graded by the new ANACS [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I think it would go VG8.
That is a sharp looking coin!
Me three! 64 it is.
Got this from TNA [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Another 1940- [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
FWIW, it is not a 67. 64/65 would be more like it. Those spots on the reverse hurt its grade.
I have several moderns from them off eBay. Not a problem. However, the prices I have seen on their web site, let's just say they are not the...
I am planning to be at the TNA Friday.
50
Lousy pictures, but I think it shows the lines. And this one is bad - line-wise. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
My proofs are going to be a lot harder to catch, but my 85-S, 87-S, 88-S, 89-S and 90-S all have the lines and all end at the devises. So the...
I cannot say that the streaks ALWAYS are due to the alloy, but almost so. However, your spots will typically come from external sources.
These are anything but rare. A quick check found these. They are all business strikes, but I also have several proofs. And these lines run...
They are on the coin and they are die scratches (AKA die polish lines). Notice how each line stops at the devices. Scratches on the coin would...
And quickly!
Not that I think 63 is right, but it is better than the red. I don't suppose it would be worth sending in for reconsideration.
I could easily go with 65 BN, but I probably would have guessed 64 BN from PCGS. But 63 RED would not have crossed my mind. Forget the number,...
Nice coin, but just where did PCGS come up with that grade?
I have managed to bring several collectors to my side. So, yes, there is some interest, but not enough to garner more than a buck or so.
Separate names with a comma.