Cool! I've never seen a holder made to accommodate both of the 42 nickels.
This might help: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/how-do-you-spot-fake-trade-dollars-anyway.63695/
I like 1, better strike, luster looks nicer, no distracting mark on jaw.
I'm a member and have learned a lot on the forum, bought some nice coins on the BST, and have several friends, mainly in the trade dollar and...
Great video and all are beautiful coins. (your accent makes me feel right at home... Henry Co.)
I agree with Mainebill's comments. Should straight grade if submitted.
XF; some of the brown crust on the obverse may be organic matter that would come off in acetone. Worth a try.
[IMG][IMG]
The mintmark looks like the chickenhead variety, beak pointing to 10 O'clock. Thanks for providing good quality photos.
It looks like a decent example, with surface corrosion and a planchet flaw as made. I don't think 200 is out of line. That Fugio has a ton of...
Nice job! I just bought a 70/70 so am about to begin my own little saga.
[IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG]
Fantastic! Great story.
I was thinking 64 too . Those wide open fields really invite contact marks, but 62 seems harsh to me.
66?
congratulations!
Nice looking proof. Impossible to judge hairlines from photos, so will estimate PR65 to 66.
Yes, that the mint in Phila would send dies to SF without a mintmark would seem to be a major mistake. I've never heard of that happening before.
I only got an error message when I clicked on the link provided. Turns out the coin was posted to a thread over on CU. The general consensus was...
Separate names with a comma.
