Your #1 would relate more to varieties than mint errors. Your #2 would all be Post Strike Damage. A better definition (and it isn't completely...
Yes they do, and they shouldn't. (Would be interesting to know when they started doing that. I've read through a lot of mint correspondence up...
Yes, and another old term for it was "chatter strike".
Basically the size of a nickel. Bet that will be fun to edge letter.)
You and thousands of other people. Hence the reason why they will never be worth significantly over face value.
There is no clash on the 1852 trime, that's progressive image transfer. (OK there MAY be a bit of a clash showing between the C and the left most...
Couldn't have been that wonderful You remember it. :)
Either plated, or it has had the copper plating removed, or the least likely possibility it was struck on a non plated planchet.
Close ups are out of focus but the fields do show some moderate die wear flow lines so it may be showing die deterioration doubling.
Not mine, does belong to someone here, it gets posted a lot. They found it in one of the half dollar bags that the mint sold directly to collectors.
Add 1992 D Close to your list as well.
Looks like a collapsed area of zinc rot under the plating.
And if it is glaringly wrong then declare it a "mechanical error" :)
From the historical prices they have charged for their 1 oz silver medals, figure $50 apiece. Their surveys don't impress me, they have done...
I wonder how much you could sell a mailing list of people that actually buy coins on etsy for? Think about it. What would a telemarketer pay for...
No just 4 to 1. Throw an indian cent in the roller, then throw in 49 wheat cents. You'll get a tails/tail roll on average 1 roll out of 4.
7.8
No there are still about 10 1974 aluminum cents missing. Not going to find them in circulation though, Congressmen have them.
Halloween.
Not S-170, HWH too far left below the R. I'm thinking 172.
Separate names with a comma.
