[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Absolutely counterfeit date digits are totally wrong. Weak mushy denticles with missing area weak overall details rough surfaces and generally off...
Well nobody was posting anything. Let’s see. There’s always a dissenter somewhere
I thought the first au 58. The other has great luster but too bad about the rims
A bit baggy but strong luster I’d grade it ms 62. I was going to guess you paid $25. So a good deal
Seems fishy
[ATTACH] Ok I’ll post this.
$1450
I’d call that more satiny if I was to use a description but what I would call that is a very eye appealing attractive coin which I think is...
On occasion yes. But for the most part they don’t sticker coins with surface problems
Nice
Cac not only will sticker for being accurately graded and high end for the grade but the coin must also be original and usually eye appealing....
I’m at 64 as well and looks dipped. Though the luster may be better in hand
I’d call it vg 10 nice clean surfaces
You’re right next door to Canada
[ATTACH]
That’s right. I just spaced on that.
Separate names with a comma.
