Interesting. I gave you 7 grades to pick from. 6 of them got votes and no one got it right. ANACS gave it a 61. Yes, luster is lacking, but...
55 and 62
Sorry, but you "signed" a contract when you joined eBay. It is legal, valid and binding despite eBay's lack of enforcement. And, yes, there are...
The reason I asked was; See post #1 He did not "break of communications" until after the seller had broken the law twice and lied to him...
Just curious, but did you bother to read what he posted? BTW, I also hope "he'll report your extortion email to eBay" and eBay will remove the seller.
pr64
My first take was 63 cam. I will stick with it.
64 cam
Light wear. AU55
HINT: So far no one is in the right decade. Although a couple have the right mint.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Close. They put it back on in 1918, but I am not saying that is its date.
OMG!!! I could only dream.
That coin has had an acid bath.
Try something different. Sellers pics, but I don't think they could alter it much if any. Try guessing the date and mint. [ATTACH]
I at 63 or 63* if it is NGC. Too many nicks.
Yes, it is an MPL. He has posted it several times before, but I cannot find the grade.
Luster with spots. How did they balance them. 65?
I am stuck between 64 and 65 so I will say 64+.
Just for fun! 1942-S PCGS slabbed. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.