I do not think it is a plate bubble. It looks like a damaged die to me.
63 That reverse spoiled it.
The rest of the time, they were promptly send including several times before I even paid.
The one time they were late for me, they shipped it that day.
Call them. I think you will be surprised the response you get.
I do not like that color, but I do not see a mark on that coin. It seems to have good luster. 67? If not, probably 66.
I have a set of satin Lincolns 2005 - 2008. Some are graded MS## and some are graded SP##. I don't thing the TPG's could make up their mind...
There are umpteen different series out there let alone different dates. Each one gives you a different answer. Try to collect a set of 63...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
If you are sure you father kept it for a numismatic reason, it might also be a doubled die. There are a couple that year, but you are going to...
That is pure guess as to the why tin, but it makes sense. I found the 1%...
I have seen 4% zinc and 1% tin. But, yes, it was removed to make it available to the war. If you look at those pennies/cents 1945 and 1946 you...
Not sure what you want to do with this, but it is pretty well agreed that from 1944 through 1946, tin was excluded from the mixture. It was...
You are correct. It says "ONE CENT". So why is it not called a ONE CENT? You should not get 3 cents in change. You get 3 one cents in change....
Without getting into specifics, you will find several threads covering this topic with widely differing opinions. Doug claims to have seen...
Yes, there is a 1936 satin proof. Not cheap, BTW. This is a $2600 coin. [IMG]
65 here too
Here is a different one. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Yep! There is something about this topic that just drives people over the top. I have not clue what it is. I am as big a penny/cent collector...
Separate names with a comma.
