[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Looked a little spooned. but the reeding along the perimeter was in too good of shape. The inner ring is what bothers me.
I have been on my search for a long nock. And keep finding older slabs and appealing coins that I like.
I now see what you were looking at. the raised area around the outside of the 3. The doubling is on the inside of the 3. Being a late die stage it...
I am guessing whizzed.
Forgot, guess the slab.
Whats the grade of the Morgan below. If you don't want to type your opinion please use the poll. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I have been looking thru a $50 bag of 63D hoping to find one. At one time there was a 73' that looked almost the same, but it was debunked.
Neat variety, I hope you didn't have to pay too much.
It was the wrong answer. But sounded good.
I am glad someone posted it. @Twyzm your looks like a later die stage than what is shown on VV. Nice find!
I spent a little bit of time this morning looking up the variety. This is the same reverse die that was used on the 1833 B-1. The reverse design...
I know what there business model is. There are plenty of coins that get a sticker that are over graded by at least a point or 2, some IMO 3-4...
We can also add in the variety aspect. If it is an unattributed rare die pairing, then one should expect to pay a higher price.
Link?
DO you have it in hand yet? Are they all BU?
MS64+
After 1989 the MM were added to the working hub and not the individual dies. So, rpm's cannot happen. What you have is mechanical/machine doubling.
Actually Paddyman has it right. The abrasion doubling has been "debunked" Here is a reference for abrasion doubling....
My best guess is that you are looking at Abrasion doubling. Notice the heavy die polish in the fields.
Separate names with a comma.
