I thought you had the small eagle dime. Actually I thought you had 2 as I talked to you about buying one a few years back
Yeah I don’t think the eliasberg collection will ever be equaled. Though he didn’t have a 70-s half dime as it wasn’t discovered to exist until...
Someone had some fun with it
Congratulations a nice coin for your birthday
$375
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Man they’re tough. I want a well struck original ms 64-5 with nice surfaced but haven’t seen one I like when I’m looking. I...
Send to cac. I’d never in a million years crack it out of that old holder
How that got that grade was beyond me. And I think it got the cac sticker on office Christmas party day after way too much spiked eggnog
Really nice. And a good strike too
Not real no chance
Absolutely beautiful example of an incredible rarity. If I had the money I’d be happy to own it
His call was 63+ mine was 64 and in no way did I think that coin deserved any better cause of that big mark in a prime focal area I didn’t think...
I’d say vf 30 and nice crusty original
I thought 65 before the reveal. I do think it could upgrade but me I’d send to cac. I like it. If it wasn’t an 80-s I’d have said higher
I think harshly cleaned and in between vf 35/xf 40 details. I agree with the cleaned dug coin as the fields look scrubbed with a wire brush
I’m in full agreement. I saw a few small marks on the shield and the left obverse field but nothing else and I’m very familiar with grading these....
A grade I didn’t agree with. Was ms 64*. I personally thought it no better than 63 because of that mark and all over bagginess of the obverse....
62 obverse 65 reverse. Nice color. I’m at 63
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] I’m just the opposite. I’ll buy a white Morgan to sell but I’d never have one in...
A baggy 63 with no major marks and strong luster. I’d call it a high end 63
Separate names with a comma.
