64 a few too many marks for gem
I was torn between 35 and 40. Personally I don’t think it’s got that much wear especially in the fields and is more strike. And it has a decent...
I went 62 it’s baggy and that cheek is beat up. I have a very similar example that went pcgs 62,
Baggy and a touch of high point rub. Weak strike notwithstanding 58
Thank god I have a resale exemption on sales tax
Me I’ll take a large cent with a small cud
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Absolute blazing luster for $30. Pics don’t do it justice
I’m going to say you paid $32
I feel the same
I thought 63 and maybe a star. The slab pics id said definitely a star
I like a as the surfaces look the nicest and it’s got good color
With the side by side pics I see a baggy 63 and a nice 64 that’s one major mark away from a gem. That being said grading in hand and grading from...
I’m in full agreement
To me it looks like a struck coin from the pics
I don’t see much marks but it doesn’t have great luster or pop. I said 65
80 s. I think the marks on the jawline keep it at 64 pl
It’s an 81-cc. I’m saying 65. If it was an 81-s I’d say 64. I think those are more luster breaks than significant marks. And it’s got beautiful...
Baggy. I’m at 62. And no star. Not enough luster or exciting color
Was small eagle half dimes my bad
Also have a brown caca sticker for coins that are crap
Separate names with a comma.