Taking some of the comments to heart I have attached 3 more that I did some light variations on. These three have a little toning on them which...
I believe this one is an example of extreme whizzing. Comments? [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thanks, I remember that post and liked the ideas.
The Limited Edition contains coins that are redundant.
It's great that we can make such friends that help each other. You see a lot of that here on CT. It also played a big part in building my...
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback.
Thanks for the feedback @Evan Saltis I have the same problems.
My entire collection is based upon eye appeal.
I am making photographic records of all my sets. I just started my ASE Bullions. They are difficult to photograph. Here are three that I would...
Too bad it was on the end where it got marked by the roller. Great find though.
Really? Here's a start. [ATTACH]
I agree.
Great idea, but I wouldn't know where to start.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I don't understand how a coin could be considered PL when there is so much detail missing. It almost looks like a weak strike. What is the standard?
Great coin. I have a couple of those 50th Anniversary Sets. All 4 coins are awesome.
Keep the good information flowing.
Decide what eye appeal suits you and your collection. Go for that. Never be concerned about status or competition such as mine is graded higher...
Look like punch outs from electrical boxes. Perhaps left over from a job in the area.
I still think the blank was damaged prior to the strike.
Thanks. I too do not watch much TV. When I do it is typically history and documentary stuff. I like to surf history and archeology articles on-line.
Separate names with a comma.
