The mint according to RIC though, is Rome.
that's why you should check the actual reference
According to RIC, both 10 and 12 are from the Rome mint.
nvm
It is indeed an error in RIC...these coins for Licinius all have the short legend IMP LICINIVS AVG. Even the plate coin in RIC VII for Aquileia 39...
The FEL TEMP galley type likely reference a visit to Britain circa 342-3 by Constans to quell a rebellion. [ATTACH]
NVM
Thank you, but I can only take credit (or blame) for quickly getting packages to the post office, then all credit (or blame) is on them.
you might get a certain number of articles free before it kicks in.
it's behind a paywall
The weight does not matter at all in this case. As far as what to look for, they are die matches; which means they are identical, except flans or...
For starters, they are die matches. Also note how much smoother the fields are on these coins, since they are pressed and not properly struck....
They are pressed not cast, so flans will be different.
Sorry, but the Constans FEL TEMP galley is a fake. From the 2009 "Smederova Hoard" [ATTACH] [ATTACH] a group shot of the fakes [ATTACH]
dots on Probus coinage from Lyons might not be common, but not rare either. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That's a Lugdunum thing. You can find it on later issues also like this Constantius I issue below. CONSTANTIVS NOB•C• [ATTACH]
No, the publishers of RIC have not authorized digital versions; but (surprise) copies have infiltrated the internet.
Antioch 47 has six different field marks listed in RIC. 1-5 have Θ only in the left field, with different right fields. Below is a pic from RIC IX...
Your coin is RIC IX Antioch 47c, if you need a picture, here is a link-- https://www.nummus-bible-database.com/monnaie-90371.htm the NRC coin...
Separate names with a comma.
