The only thing discernible from the photos is that it's a trail die. You can read about them here: http://www.traildies.com/index.html
58.
Given the impaired luster, spotting and what I consider a weak strike for an '11-S I went with 62. Given the lack of contact marks a 63 wouldn't...
Thanks Jim. So there's a premium just because your coin was photographed?
Someone enlighten me. This is a new term for me. What is a "plate"? Thanks, Jody http://www.teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2882&lot=1041
Me too. Normally I focus mostly on the reverses looking for doubled columns and wavy steps.
A new website and something else to look for in your searching! MAD Die Clashes.
I blew it on that one. RLM, thanks again for these threads.
I thought the same thing. Grading errors seems to always be a pot-shot, but I guess the wheat ears killed it from being graded higher.
Probably the result of a very simple science experiment. Turn pennies to silver and gold.
Don't send them over there! I don't want any more Dollar coins either.:hammer:
Since when did '09s have what looks like plating bubbles on the reverse? Also, maybe it's just the angle, but shouldn't that period between the D...
Elbesar- That's a nice coin! I think that's probably my favorite off-center that I've ever seen.
I have no clue about nickels, but if it's a Redbook error then PCGS price guide is also in error as they don't list a '68 from P either. My guess...
Can you really ship worldwide from China for under two bucks or is he counterfeiting the postage as well?
That reverse is also a lamination peel. Unlike the obverse it has just completely peeled off. Nice find.
It is true that it costs more to produce it than it's worth, but there are no current plans to phase it out.
I kind of like the idea of two sets running. I enjoy these threads and they are much appreciated.
JJK78- BTW, those are some great photos; what did you shoot them with?
Didn't even notice that until you said something. Definitely. A nice one too.
Separate names with a comma.
