All over . . . it exhibits micro-porosity throughout, likely from having spent time in acidic surroundings.
Environmental damage.
Yup
Retained luster does not throw graders off. It is the default criteria a grader should resort to using when a coin was struck poorly or...
Sweet XF45
Can't recall, but don't think I've had one of those Paddy. Neat!
Pretty coin!
1884-O Morgan? I can think of a lot of other coins I'd rather spend that kind of money on.
You'd better tell him to take his sweet time growing up Randy . . .
50
I’ve just been informed my table number is (Edit . . . See Post 33 for correction).
Joe, have you tried Jon Sullivan?
Thanks for that . . . :hilarious:.
I've seen one that was barely attached . . . perhaps bonded only 10 - 15%, and the halves had not been damaged at all . . . quite a rarity to find...
I think the other half is dated 1894 . . . :rolleyes:
How about a separated half of a clamshell split? [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Keeping it family-friendly, if we gave them all 5 Chinese finger traps, they'd have to invest a lot more time typing those fraudulent emails with...
Good to know . . . I'll keep my eyes peeled for those when I next visit, thanks Randy.
So, when I’m visiting my folks in your neck of the woods, are they hard to find in local restaurants?
Alright Randy, please do tell . . . What am I missing?
Separate names with a comma.
