Got it. From the reflection looked like it could have been moderately doubled.
This: [ATTACH]
RLM- Is it just a reflection, or is that eyelid doubled to the east?
Given anyone else, and I would say the luster could grab a 67, but with PCGS I went with 66.
66.
While I'd love to chime in here, it would be futile as this thread is destined to be closed. I wish we could debate politics here, but I don't...
The 44-D looks like RPM-005. ++Nice finds!++ Since I haven't spoken to you before, welcome to CT! Put whatever you want in your titles.
Not much you can do there. Keep in mind that the cheaper the price, generally, the less you will get for the coin if you want to resell it. What...
Something about that obverse just looks microscopically(so to speak) beat to heck to me. The reverse doesn't look as bad though.
Here's an article, but keep in mind I could be wrong. The surface just looks wrong to me, with too many tiny marks covering the whole thing....
It may just be the photo, or it may just be my monitor, but I would say whizzed. I don't like the look of the surfaces at all.
Now that's one fugly coin IMO. :D
Definitely not a good time to stock up on them at $50 a pop. The population of PF69s is going to grow and grow.
Some call it "strike doubling", some "machine doubling"...I prefer to call it die-shift doubling. Either way, unfortunately it is not a doubled...
Nice pick-ups. I really like that first one.
Thanks EyeEat. That's it, I'm not a paid subscriber so I can't see the tabs.
I would wait for Mike. I don't think he visits daily, but I'm sure he'll pick back up on it. I too want to know what causes this. I know it's...
But with proper storage any coin can become toned; it can't however develop full steps.
I can tell you for a fact, that "Twist-n-crimp" doesn't do anything more than EyeEat said, which is mash the paper down.
They say "current average prices for EVERY PCGS-graded coin, but if you can find that then I'm missing something, unless PCGS has never graded a...
Separate names with a comma.
