I dont know if any error or variety can have an accurate production number
No errors there. Sorry, bro.
Definitely has the typical "porous" look to it. I stand corrected.
It is not far-fetched. The 3 people you asked are obviously not error specialists and clearly do not know what they are talking about. They are...
Because these are absurdly rare, he posted no photos, and the likelyhood of him finding one in circulation is just not believable.
Possible, yes. Likely, no way.
It didn't happen even if he shows them
Well, it is possible for lamination of individual clad layers on clad coinage. Kind of tricky with zinc cents though. I guess we would have to...
I'm going to say with complete certainty you did not find a 1939 Henning nickel in circulation
agreed
Me too. Count the number of the first set directly behind his head in front of the Y in LIBERTY. I see four in that grouping.
Look directly behind his head. I see three, clear columns. Maybe 4?
This is among the deepest die clashes I have seen on a Lincoln cent, copper or zinc. I see at least a triple clash on the obverse, known as a...
[ATTACH] I disagree. I do not believe it is a clash. The markings do not look correct. This one has the markings in the proper place.
As an error collector, it is even tougher for me to find someone to leave them to as few people like errors. I have no children (yet), three...
I love it when I actually give a good guess :)
Whether it is or not, it is too worn. Definitely a spender
Do not use YouTube as a source, unless it is a video from the Mint posted on there. Same with Facebook.
Altered, thus damaged. Not a genuine error. Worth 1 cent
Damaged and altered in multiple ways. Worth 1 cent. 100% not a Mint error.
Separate names with a comma.
