Tough call. I’m going no from the pics due to lack of luster. That being said it’s a pretty coin I wouldn’t care if it had a bean or not I think...
Could fool a novice or at a glance. Here’s a couple real ones of mine to compare [ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Lilttle wipe on the obverse fields. Otherwise original. For a raw cleaned coin I could live with it as it’s not scrubbed to death
It may have been done in the 50s forgeries like this are not at all new
Zinc rot at it’s finest
Seems right to me. Maybe 55 on a good day
I agree. I like crusty original gold. But sometimes rarity overrides this. Especially in finding early southern good with eye appeal. Between bad...
No star. Pretty though
I think he was around long before the first coins were struck
My thoughts debris filled the mintmark
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] How about some old stuff
I don’t like the reverse scratches on the gold. And they’re tough on it. No bean
Wow. I’m surprised. I think I remember Gerry having that. My half came through him too he’s local to me half the year and a friend too
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Ms 64 and $40
I can imagine. I need a nice 59 myself I had a cleaned xf that I’d bought 30 years ago I may still have somewhere
Just a nice honest original with beautiful surfaces. Nice pickup
[ATTACH]
Oh wow. Nice tough date coin. Looks original and accurately graded. I’m saying yes on green
Separate names with a comma.
