Same here
That’s a scary one. But it’s not the first high quality 78-cc fake I’ve seen there was one posted a few years ago that fooled me too. Was cleaned...
Finding the die pair with the same poor quality denticles and mm position gives me more confidence in yours being real. When I initially...
Not a rare variety . Probably a straight xf 40. I don’t see the rims stopping it no problem on its authenticity. Nice eye appeal though
A pretty coin and worth the money in my opinion
A fin is a person from Finland lol
How was that $50
You and these hard to grade Indians ms 64
Original and clean 66 not hard to grade from the 2 sets. Though that mark on the face hard to tell if it’s planchet mark or a hit
I see 1867 too
Nice toning. Verycommon to find late days Buffalos with good color
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Gives you a sampling of the treasures that abound in my workshop lol
This is a weaker formulation than what I use. I looked. Mine methylene chloride and methanol that’s it. It’s nasty stuff
Killer luster. Toning is subtle but there. For toning I’d give it a 1 for eye appeal for a 50-d I’d give it a 6
Vile stuff won’t touch it
I think it’s questionable I’ve seen old copies of these that really look good even been fooled by them. Color looks off looks brassy not copper...
Nice. This is an era and area I find very fascinating and have thought about collecting myself
This doesn’t pop but certain spots are pretty 3.9
Nice one
Same or scrape it off. Or scrub it with steel wool. I’ll look tomorrow at the ingredients
Separate names with a comma.
