I thought solid 63. The luster decent and I’m thinking the marks may be worse in pics. I bought one years ago with fairly dull luster I thought...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Tough to find. And underrated. I have a few as mf moRei don’t have pics of handy
I’d crack the details and leave the straight graded. Agree hopefully the details will gain a little skin
Congratulations
I was low. Not counting on strike. And looked more abraded luster to me than a 58, but not a series I am that knowledgeable in
Had a 1873 dime mis labeled open 3. But it was a 73 arrows which are all open 3. The no arrows open 3 much rarer than the closed 3
Clean. No major marks 64
Vf 35
Me. Long time member
Beautiful and I wouldn’t touch the old holder
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thanks for posting yeah. A fake that would fool a lot of people but not someone that knows the series. At least it’s silver
These are pretty good counterfeits except the 78-cc. The granular surface a easy tell Thanks for posting
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Mine not amazing but an honest example
Well aware being a huge history nut. But not out there in so called modern history books
I love em both. A true type set has both a business strike and proof example. Here’s why...
Thanks for the info I haven’t seen these restrikes before. I’ve seen a lot of copies too
I see an old dip on both. Dime probably market acceptable from pics but 63-4 at best. Quarter I’d say questionable surfaces at best and 55-8
Love an honest low rider like this
Good to know I’ll let you know I might have some shit
Separate names with a comma.
