WELCOME :hail: to the forum. I do beleive that it is part of the design.
Yeah, look at this. I still haven't stop laughing....
WELCOME to the forum :hail:. What I am seeing is machine doubling, that's probably why you don't see this type of doubling in the cherrypickers...
There's something there but I can't tell what it is, there's marks all around that area.
A 1947S, it's the same coin, one shot upright the other inverted.
Here's a 'S' from different angles, it might help. Yours does look inverted. [IMG] [IMG]
Yeah, I don't see it either. Could be a die gouge you're looking at.
I'm curious as to what this is on the 'S'. Is it a die chip or damage? Without it, it would not look inverted. [IMG]
Hi and WELCOME :hail: to the forum. There were two different mintmarks used in 1947, the Serif S and the Sans Serif S. Yours closely resembles the...
Looks like a late stage brockage. Of course looks can be deceiving.
That's what I do. And WELCOME :hail: to the forum.
I agree, look also at the right side of the steps on your coin vs. the 1968D-1DR-001, MDS and LDS.
That's right.
Wow I made a booboo. I have a picture of the 1970 'S' mint mark, sorry. It's not yours because it is a 1970 and yours is a '74. I got my forums...
Well it may not be on coppercoins list but their is a number for the 1970S1MM-001 and yours is not the one. Also yours looks like Machine...
Well then good, I won't feel to bad about the coins I bought if they turn out to be AT. But now that I think I know more they look AT'd.
The second picture (can't tell for sure) looks as though a piece of metal was struck to the coin in the minting process, the third pic. shows an...
Is that 1884 naturally toned or the other? What is the best give-away that a coin is artificially toned?
Those two are lamination errors. A lamination error occurs when the surface of the coin looks like it is peeling off.
Wow, beautiful coins, makes me want some, natural toners. WELCOME :hail: to the forum Rctoners.
Separate names with a comma.
