Looks like a die chip. Not much valve accept in the eye of the beholder.
Not even close.
With the evidence shown it's really hard to call this anything but a struck through.
Definitely looks like one. What year is it? 1983? If so it's the 1983P-1DR-001. And a nice find.
Looks like die wear has caused that.
Nice crack, not an error. They are the norm and rarely are considered significant varieties or errors by most advanced error-variety specialists....
This is known as a 'counter-stamped' they are novelty to me personally, and are collected as such.
Still curious if this is a lamination error, almost looks contaminated with something. [ATTACH]
Got this the other day, I like it; sellers pics. Haven't had a chance to photo it. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Sweet!!
Looks like the 5 was hit with something. The number is still the normal size just with a dent in it.
That's what is being said.
Some fingernail polishes have additives in them. It's best to use pure.
Here's one you might like as well; [ATTACH]
Yes it is.
I know you read this but for others here's the info so far. http://www.cointalk.com/t71413/.
Don't be so paranoid, the comment was referring to the post provided.
The image you provided is exactly what I'm talking about, to blurry to detect what you are saying.
Here's the one mentioned in the book, not a match; [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Well then you'd better tell these people that. http://www.cointalk.com/t69385/
Separate names with a comma.
