Nice error! Not damage.
At one time there were believed to be three sizes, small, medium, and large. Later it was conclusively proved, based on Mint records, that only...
I'll agree with that explanation yr69593 And Welcome to the forum.
Great pictures too.
Welcome to the forum yr69593. Starting in 1982 the cent was made of zinc plated in copper. Because of this there will be problems with the zinc...
I agree, once you've seen so many and the picture is pretty clear to determine if it has anything else of interest, what else is there to look for?
I agree. You can see those marks all around the coin's reverse. And Welcome to the forum budsmoker
I'd stay from this guy's accuracy. He's got a 1921 Peace which he calls a Vam#2-R which as the vam site say's is (Eliminated, doubling on PEACE...
Wow and at a reduced price. It does look like die deterioration to me. Lousy pictures.
Sorry, I did't think I was doing any harm. I didn't know it was stealing. It won't happen again.
No, I don't see it either. The photo is kind of dark and blurry and the reflections of light can fool you.
Let it go jc. In a few days this thread will be buried and nobody will see it.
Actually it's not mine. Here's a pic. of the reverse it might help; [ATTACH]
It's a 1970-D Jefferson five-cent piece with what looks like an unusual error. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I heard it used and used it after this comment http://www.cointalk.com/t66088/ and got in trouble for useing it. http://www.cointalk.com/t71333/
I agree and as your finding out it's common.
As was explained before a gouge would not show up on the coin as an indent, the gouge would be in the die, therefore it would be reverse of the...
Welcome puffnstuff. What you have looks like a mis-aligned die.
Well said, it's just what I was going to say. No more to say on this thread
Picture is way to small to view and if I zoom in it's to blurry. Do you have a way to take another picture but closer to the area you want to show?
Separate names with a comma.
