Unfortunately, Littleton's packaging doesn't add value. I have one of those coins, and even though it's in nice condition it's worth face value.
I agree- 1969 S would be higher AU than the '64. Don't send the coins to get graded though, it wouldn't be worth it.
Post a clearer picture! But, weigh it- see if it weighs less than 2.7 grams for a start.
Non- clad coins weigh less than a normal coin, so, check a coin if you suspect it of being a mint error. However, with your coin, it is clear that...
I think... it's a damaged coin.
Looks like a large date to me. Try taking photos with less glare.
Large date- but, in that horrible condition it doesn't make any difference. Spend it!
Another way ridges quickly disappear from coinage is through general circulation.
I received this 1977 $100 note today. Unfortunately, since my general rule with high denominations is to keep either crisp unc., star, or really...
I agree, environmental damage.
Very nice find! I would definitely keep it, being a relatively low denomination, and an older series. Mostly I would set it aside because my album...
MS 61, possibly. A couple of minor nicks, but, altogether a nice coin.
Altogether, even if a coin is a key date, I would stay away from poor condition key dates. Such coinage is expensive in good condition, but, if...
I agree, surprising that a person who is eager to dump over $700 on a coin don't care much for research. Or, if not research, why not just look...
*Orange rim indicates an uncirculated coin.
Well, I went through 2 rolls of quarters just now, and nothing remotely interesting. Halfway late 60s/early 70s quarters, and halfway ATB/worn...
Interesting toning, but it might be artificial (it looks too good), in my opinion.
Common year- worth around $20.
Yes, a better picture is needed. But, being a very common year, it'll probably be worth $20.
Yes, damage. Scratched up coin.
Separate names with a comma.
