Nice find Jay.
I think you'll get more. Aside from the AT, your photos clearly show that the coin is in decent shape.
Suit yourself.
Why don't you enlighten us on that attribution that came back different.
A combination of MD and die deterioration.
You'll need much better pictures than that for us to confirm even the stronger doubled dies.
This is not the first coin in mint packaging to be found damaged, nor will it be the last.
Chances are it's machine doubling instead of a doubled die, but I'll await photos.
That's RPM-001 and a nice find. It does have some value because it's listed in The Cherrypicker's Guide, but not a lot. In that shape, maybe $10.
That's a nice example.
As a follow up, the last PCGS certified wide AMs to sell on Teletrade were a 63 that went for $12 and a 64 that went for $18. Ouch. What's it...
I have no idea what other 2000 cents you're looking at, but this is a completely normal beard....
Still not DO-001. I'm not sure where you're getting these magnification figures at, but most of the coins from CC that you are posting are around...
Nice find. I like them when the design is missing without a trace as it is with the 1 on this example.
The extra thickness and notching you are seeing on the coppercoins example, and the lack thereof on your coin have nothing at all to do with...
I'm stumped on this one. You needed an example of a 1941 with the trumpet tail mint mark(MMS-004)?
What are you talking about "plum"? There are no angles or distortion going on in the Coppercoins photos.
It's not about thermodynamics. It's about the hammer die pulling metal into the deepest recessed areas of the die. Equal and opposite reactions....
Someone graded it a 67?
The FS-502 was the easy part. Now send me my coin. :p
Separate names with a comma.
