It's a DDR; I'm not sure which one though. There are a lot listed for this series.
All I'm seeing is some MD and die deterioration doubling.
1968 was the last year that the obverse hub from 1916 was used. It was incredibly worn. This is why on 1968 Cents the outer devices touch the rim.
I wouldn't say that at all. There are plenty of varieties and more substantial errors to be found in the Lincoln Cent series. There are also...
I agree with Simon that it's technically an error, but it is such a common one(much like misaligned dies) that it does not command a premium. You...
I now have the coin, and as evidenced by the original photos it is a doubled die. The doubling is seen on ERTY, IGWT, the hair under the R and 67....
This is an example of machine doubling.
Yep, MD.
Nice find.
Not sure. All my coins ship to my post office box, and that gets picked up once a week. So..if it came this week, I'll have it tomorrow when I...
Could be damage or could be a minor struck-through. I wish the A was as crisply focused as the top of the coin.
It's a die chip. They tend to be common in and around the date.
Yeah, there's probably some zinc rot going on. Take a look at these examples of zinc rot- http://imgs.inkfrog.com/pix/coop49/Rise_Fall_Fell_Off.jpg
It's a plating blister. If you look you'll see them elsewhere on the coin too. Very common on the earlier, copper-plated zinc Cents.
Separate names with a comma.
