I like the toning, looks to have just missed FSB: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Not to sound too authoritative, but it most certainly is. I actually love the simplicity of the reverse design - almost reflecting the wren on the...
Fairly graded and happy I got this one....
Ah will do.
Yes, a bit nervous how this one works out & will keep all posted - think I will submit at the Baltimore show this fall....
Thanks for the advice. Yes, I will along with the 1852 C $5 at the next Baltimore show. I had good fortune having gotten a very nice 1932 S...
Indeed Bought in English auction. actually I have gotten rather nice coins there before I buy GB coins frequently at many of these auction houses...
Yes, absolutely a good point JM and I (probably most of us) need to really look carefully at the third side as you've said.
I got this recently at auction as it is better than the one I have - can’t afford the higher denominations in any kind of grade that I’d like![ATTACH]
Yes, think I will and will try to get an edge picture as soon as I can. I actually was out to bid on an 1854 S dollar and bought this as well.......
Yes, maybe I should submit through a dealer. For some reason I get slammed when I submit myself.....Nice luster and pleasant coin overall though.
[ATTACH]
Has a poor look to it. When a seller gives qualifiers like that, they likely have doubts themselves...
AU55. Looks to be some wear in areas like around the eyes and lustre loss over much of the coin. There appears to be a scratch above 2nd cloud...
Yes, although the photos are true to form as the coin actually has a beautiful rose toning with outstanding lustre. I know I am biased but I would...
LOL Sounds like either a Beach girl name or a stripper!
LOL. Well not the best of friends....Not my cup of tea exactly although looks-wise she came off well on early coins.
Umm, while that is true Offa, this is struck in copper nickel however and think it is rather scarce. This at larger auctions will cost a lot more...
Not sure if you guys clicked the image to blow it up but quite nice wear pattern. P&G, interesting comment. In hand though, the lustre particular...
Well, 64 but in hand I really can not see less than 66 to be honest as there are virtually no marks with the fields and really vulnerable areas...
Separate names with a comma.
