It's a decent fake, but still a fake, and not worth over the price of a 1892 S in G, which is probably BV.
Thanks. What about Burma ??
GEF, nothing else. Might have been dipped, but the wear is cabinet/bag friction.
Real! Very real ! An both seem to be really good EFs, with one approaching MS.
Fake fake fake. If it is made of Pewter it is fake. All the original strikes were in Tin, or Silver washed pewter.
If that is a conservative VF-EF, then you have struck lucky. If you really mean F-VF, then still pretty lucky.
Welcome to the forum!! As for the coin, it looks like Burma/Thailand, but I am doubtful about how authentic it is.
That coin is an original Afghan quarter Rupee.
It's a gold pagoda, and there are hundreds of types that Krause don't know about. Check a specialist catalougue.
The biggest reason that the grading companys give to persuade you to submit things is that they will grade it. This is ridiculous-if you don't...
Quite funny...
XF ??? Are you mad ??? Just a decent strike GF !!!
It seems to be real. I don't think there is much danger of the patina of that coin being interrupted by your fingers, as there is no lustre left....
Nice normal, circulated 1883, with some real character to it.
I would wash all of those pieces abit, and use a wire brush with blunt points (that won't scratch) on those cents.
Net AG? , G , but that pitting makes it worth less than the AG price. Rare enough for me to congratulate you....
The British 1797 twopence. It's a coin for everyone, the prized fine of the complete begginer to the gilt proof of the advanced collector...
If you want it slabbed, go for ANACS.Anywhere else will reject it. GF+, but probably more like a net VG.
If it is unique you can't take it out...:(
n.6 Roman provincial bronze,Egypt, go and compare the portrait, could be Tiberius/Nerva/etc, hard to tell. n.7 Roman provincial bronze, Egypt,...
Separate names with a comma.
