This bid was 4x lower estimate....Yes, that farthing was nice as was the "hyper" rare 1945 brass 3d in proof....I have NEVER seen that one but...
This from the St. James Sale today, a very rare 1955 Proof Halfcrown - Proof 66, scratches on plastic. Now if only I can find that pesky 1959!...
Here ya go, I took this picture of the PCGS Trueview: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Ah thanks, certainly not perfect but well struck for issue. Even though a more common date of the early date Vicky 2/6 is better than what I have....
This just purchased at the recent Baldwin auction. Very nice overall with just a bit of lustre loss - the nicer of the two sold that day: [ATTACH]...
NOpe just the Belgian auction house from about 15 years ago
Ah, yes. They really get some BIG prices! I have on occasion found Brit coins at reasonable prices, but can not these days afford the "big ticket"...
Those are on the plastic of the 2 x 2. Coin has a semi-cameo effect on reverse but the cameo not required for a proof as Rob said. And, well, I...
In hand, I simply can not see a 55. IMHO, worst case is 58 although VERY little wear - the thighs under mag appear more like contact on old paper....
MS 63.
Anyway, sorry about the acronym...The coin looked nice however graded well.
Ok, why did I bid on this? FOMO maybe as I didn’t get anything else. Oh well, whatcha think? [ATTACH]
In hand, looks a bit different but good. GTG if you like but it’s raw now. Probably get it slabbed. I took a tilt view because somebody asked...
Coin in hand while looking good does not have the same toning. Looks very lustrous however; took a tilt view of obverse also: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
As those who have followed some of my efforts, I have trying to assemble as fine a collection of late pre-decimal milled British silver as...
I will post in hand pictures when the coin comes to me.
I am generally against them getting in the market as it implies that somehow these coins are special and/or part of their archive or at least...
I got this at auction and liked the appearance of this coin, possibly underrated? Not a perfect coin but looking IMHO original: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I just got this raw at auction and apologise for the less than wonderful pictures. I would say that coins with apparent original toning IMHO...
Separate names with a comma.
