I still haven't seen one in person yet:-) I refuse to buy a coin that will eventually be pocket change:-)
Hi, Although there are slight variations, they are not considered die variations or die varieties. These are common things seen on all coins...
Hi, Machine doubling or post mint damage. Look at all the nicks and marks on the face and other parts of the obverse. The L of LIBERTY is also...
It is part of the design. It is on each die....as the die wears or as the coin circulates, that portion of the coin loses that detail. there is...
Hi and WELCOME, It's just machine doubling as suggested. The way the coin releases from the die or the way the die "chatters" can effect things...
Hi, There is no doubt that the coin was struck through a late stage die cap. It is an error. It is not acid treated nor is it damaged after it...
Hi, It is indeed apart of the normal design. As the die wears or as the coin wears though, it is not as visible. But.... This is exactly what...
I agree that this is neither the 1942/1941 or 1942/1941 D . There is really nothing on the coin that resembles it. Thanks, Bill
Hi Rock, I just responded under my visitors messages. Email me at foundinrolls@netscape.net I'll get you caught up. Lotsa changes....
Hi Rock H., Of course I remember you :-) Shoot me an email at my foundinrolls address foundinrolls@netscape.net I'll get you caught up....
Thanks, I saw the 24 D and it is a CUD as it has been determined. The statement i made about the weak spot on the reverse is valid. It is...
The date is not added after the hubbing as suggested. The date is part of the original design of the coin as it is executed in a digital format...
Am I mising something? I diodnt see a D in the picture.
Actually, if the die break were a cud, the oppositr side of the coin would be effected and would show up as a weakness of strike on the opposite...
I agree with Frank, I see something but I can't tell what it is. It looks , as he says like a VDB above and to the right of the primary VDB....
Try to get a better picture of the D and I'll take another look. I still think it is wear and damage but a better picture will give me a chance...
Some folks even solder a loop to these to make a button. They also attach these to the part needed to make a cuff-link.
I agree, There is nothing but wear and damage associated with this coin. Thanks, Bill
Hi Mike, Good to see you:-) Bill
The point though is that on that 1994 cent where the doubling is not at the center of the design, there are several areas of doubling and that...
Separate names with a comma.
