1963-D [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1959 has gotta be the Rodney Dangerfield of cents. Not a Wheat, not in the 60’s. Here’s a little respect for 1959. [ATTACH]
1963 Proof [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Maybe just post a few thousand at a time? [ATTACH]
1963 [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1962-D [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Nice set!
1962 Proof #3 [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Edit: I really like this one! 1962 Proof #2 [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I still haven’t wandered into my office to look at the lens, but I found these two pictures from another thread....
I will look that up for you and let you know. I recall that it is some kind of “copy” lens because it has a better depth of field and lack of...
I have a few of these, so I will post one a day. 1962 Proof [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1962 [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Also, if your FIL left pre-1964 dimes, quarters, or halves that are circulated and worn, they can be taken to a dealer or “We Buy Gold” storefront...
1961-D [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
In that case, AU64. That is, there looks like a tiny bit of rub on the cheekbone, which would knock it out of its proper grade of at least MS64....
I’m thinking the blob on the forehead brings it down to MS62 RD.
1961 Proof [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1961 [ATTACH] Full Resolution Photos [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
