Believe me, I understand. LOL I hate to do it too but I figure I'm protecting future buyers.
COOL FIND! Congrats!
Yea, and notice it's just a luster progression too. That 62 and 63 always crack me up. Post either of those on ANY internet forum and everyone...
Unc? Did you leave him appropriate feedback? I'd definately neutral him for the hassle, juicing the photos and lying.
Magicians mule maybe.
Talk about a juiced photo. It's a good think all you paid was shipping. I would have sent that back within one minute of opening it. LOL
That 61D is nice!
Nah, don't waste a grade on it. If you want to know, send it someone like Bill or Chuck, they'll look at it for you....ususally all you do is pay...
Off by one again....now I'm dropping in the ranks. I don't care, I stand by my photogrades. :smile
Amen to that....the reverse field hit and spots should have kept this out of 66. NGC stinks.
Very nice....I've never even heard of a "ragged clip". Thanks for sharing.
No offense, but you are obviously not a chemist. I'm not sure why you're trying to make up your own science, but your chemical theories and...
It's pretty cool! My only suggestion would to have it pause longer with the coin full screen so we can check it out closer. It moves too fast to...
Nice coin, hardly a hit on it. I see the TPG's 58 these sometimes but I don't think you'd buy a 58 coin.
All of those coins are worth getting graded. You should send them to PCGS.
Nice! Congrats!
Acetone will NOT remove verdigris.
Definately harshly cleaned.
Luster grade once again.
I think the reverse is going to hold this one back....at least it should.
Separate names with a comma.
