The photos by Wexler show very prominent doubling. Your coin does not exhibit this. If you have to look closer to see something, it's probably not...
I also didn't think this was a coin, because of all the Latin and religious references on it, and nothing on the net matches this. But there is a...
I assume the title is intended to say "transitional" and not "transactional". (Which isn't a word.) But I will admit I have skimmed this garbage...
Ask Paddy. He is familiar with indirect die transfer (if that's what this is.)
Wexler lists a DD for 1958, which shows true doubling. I don't see anything on yours. Please compare yours with the photos in the link:...
Smeagol
If it wasn't a mound you wouldn't be able to date it. There are ways to bring out a date, but it ruins the coin, since the mound marker identifies...
Agree F-15 cleaned, damaged. Cull value. $3.
Can you tell that is a mound, even with the wear? Agree on the Jefferson's at .05 cents each.
It's a $3 quarter. Nothing else.
The 1982 small date zinc (Philly) is harder to find than the 1982 small date copper (Philly). There are no mintages for the different varieties,...
[ATTACH]
XF details. It's worth a quarter. There are billions of modern coins like this and better than this, and they are still worth a quarter.
I never said there weren't coins on foreign planchets. What I said was yours isn't one. I suggest sending your coin in to a grading service and...
Yes. We are suppose to grade what we think the coin is. Not guess at what the coin graded at. I knew in all my guesses I was going to be a point...
The reverse is AU, but the reverse is the stronger side. There is luster. Not an MS coin. But I could see low AU. 53 ish.
Not a Canadian planchet. They made 17+ billion cents in 1982. But you have the 1 coin minted on a Canadian planchet, without any way of it being...
AHAHAHA. OK. Fake news began LONG BEFORE 2016. The 1970-S quarter minted over a 1941 Canadian quarter does exist. Not really getting any points...
I want to change my vote to AU-58.
An excess weight of .04 grams is nothing. (6.25 6.29) Well within mint tolerance. Appreciate the long troll factor though.
Separate names with a comma.
