I only clicked once.
Obsolete.
If it weighs less it could be a thinly rolled planchet, but the damage from the plating destroys any possible value. It's not aluminum. That is...
All large. Even if there was a small in there, it would be zinc. There may be 2 1982-D small date coppers, but you or I are not finding the 3rd...
You should not be allowed to bid on your own item. Auction houses that allow this seem greedy and seedy to me. Just place a reserve for the...
Oh it's a great coin. I would just like to see some clearer photos.
While I may not agree on an XF 40 grade, sometimes there are series that are more leniently graded, especially the key dates. I can't tell about...
There's no coating of zinc mixture. The plating is copper. The zinc is on the inside. It looks normal to me.
It's supposed to weigh 2.5 grams with a +/- tolerance of .10 making the normal range 2.40-2.60. While it is slightly over weight, it generally has...
Some people collect. It's probably in the genetic nature of a human being. But other people hoard. One is acceptable and one is not. If you don't...
Hand cut from a sheet. The high serial is the giveaway. It's worth $2.
Been seeing a lot of these posts. When was the last time a coin had this error? I don't recall any modern ones that do. I remember the 1955 nickel...
Yes I agree. It's just a 1. There's no 2 there.
It's supposed to be zinc. I don't know what the question is.
Your coin has full cent rims. It was struck on a cent planchet. Read my post again.
I recall Reinfeld was a very bad chess author. [ATTACH]
If it weighs correctly, it's not on a wrong planchet. It can't be on a larger planchet (it won't fit). So, if it is on a smaller planchet it can't...
When it is missing a clad layer on one side, first thing is weigh it. If it weighs normal (5.67g) it's not missing a clad layer. Also when it is...
That's not a 1973. The 1973 is backwards. Which means it was pressed into your copper plated zinc coin (with a vise or pliers) and it is supposed...
Separate names with a comma.
