It is indeed an uncentered broadstrike. Nice find.
The strike wasn't particularly weak. Instead, it shows severe die deterioration.
It's a fake. The obverse was ground or machined off.
It may indeed be missing the obverse clad layer. You should weigh it. If authentic, it would be about 0.4 grams underweight, i.e., around 1.9 grams.
Most of the obverse clad layer split off after the strike. It was preceded by a "clamshell separation", rather than a "clamshell lamination"....
This is by far the most common date for a dime-stock quarter. Evidently an entire strip of dime stock went through the quarter blanking press....
I don't recall any. I would think it's a rare bird.
Specifically, it is an uncentered broadstike.
Looks like a doubled die from here.
I don't think it is genuine. As others have remarked, there is no metal flow in design elements bordering the coin's edge, and the reverse...
Agreed. But maybe the edge was ground off afterward. At any rate, the description outlines a dubious-sounding coin.
Sounds like it was dipped in acid.
The first dime shows finning of the rim. This is caused by abnormally high overall striking pressure, or increased localized striking pressure...
I've seen many acts of vandalism that are identical to your coin. You will find it seriously underweight. The exposure of the copper core along...
The outer part of the reverse face was machined off in some fashion.
They were flattened as well as scraped. Mash any design element and it grows wider.
Your comment makes no sense. Anyway, I see no sign of die deterioration, only damage.
The obverse was removed by a milling machine or similar device.
It's post-strike damage. The letters are flattened and I can see scrape marks on top of them.
Your weights for the normal cents are way off. A copper-plated zinc cent should weigh 2.5 grams. Your "error" coin looks entirely normal. All...
Separate names with a comma.
