Die gouges IMO, not really an "error" and generally not collectible.
Extremely late die state.....the worst I've seen for the issue. While it's not really worth much, it's a very interesting coin, I'd keep it and...
Dang, at least we know it's a 1993 or later. It's still a GREAT coin!
AWESOME coin!
Yea....SWEET toner!
Whoa!
Thanks Dick!
Yes it would, a lot of the WAM die markers are known, especially for the 1999. If this were an error AND a 99 WAM we'd be talking serious money. :)
Did you check for a WAM reverse? Give us a picture of the reverse. Based on what I'm seeing, I'd guesstimate $50 or so.
PMD....no brainer.
Awesome error cent! Love the retained strike-thru!
69/70 are misaligned die strikes, a normal part of the minting process and not considered an error unless it's so far off that design elements are...
Really? You gonna open up that can of worms again? Why doesn't NCS change their name to Numismatic Cleaning Services then?
CONGRATS! That coin is the bomb IMO. I'd love to see it cartwheel in hand, I bet it's a nice show. :)
Outside of the price difference, I've seen a lot of coins that merit just a hair over a 50 but not a 55. so the 53 grade makes sense to me....at...
I think it's dumb we don't use ALL the numbers from 0-70 like the Sheldon scale was designed for.
I used nickel size 2x2's for my Lincolns.
There IS a difference between cleaning and conservation.
WOW....nice find!!
I love that 72D, what does the reverse look like? I like the older, toned counterstamps like that.
Separate names with a comma.
