Not an expert by any means. But even I could see the eagle on the 1st coin was practically a duck. And the 3 on the 2nd coin was absolutely bad.
Page is not there. But it's around 100% that coin was not genuine. Either the coin was a phony, or, if the photo was correct it may have small...
I've got my new rig hooked up, but I don't really have any good spots to hit right now. I've done the add media thing, and I was able to add it to...
TexAg Can't figure out how to add media. I did it. But when I try to add it to a post in a conversation, those photos aren't in Your Media. They...
Prob. the last one for a while. [ATTACH]
I can only assume he is thinking about a 40% 1976 quarter which would still be worth more than melt. I couldn't get the value from the HA link,...
A true 1977-D 40% silver quarter would be incredibly rare. Here's one from Heritage:...
Exactly the same. Orient your quarter correctly to the textbook photo.
It's not copper.
Yes they changed the look of the coin as mentioned. And have done so several more times since then.
What's the weight? If it's correct (I bet it's not), then testing for silver without damaging the coin would prove it either way. Since a faker...
I don't know. However, here is a comparison photo with a known real one from 1888- Philly. Yours is much farther away from the dentils. And for a...
The cent is too large to fit in the dime press. And if it could fit, it would have to be 1982 or before. I don't think you can get a woodie from...
The reason I was at 35, is because these are very difficult to grade. And sometimes they will get the benefit of the doubt upgrade.
35
My first thought was fake. I don't like the color, the date or the VDB.
This coin has already been cleaned. It's a decent year, although not much premium. I would tread lightly. Perhaps something can be done to...
Separate names with a comma.
