MS 63+ pretty coin.
$2,200 fireball people have to much money to spend.
Nailed the grade and color designation but wrong strike.For some reason the coin looked proof to me but I had my doubts,figured it might of been a...
This is the Average mint mark position for a 1916 D dime.Even in the lowest grade if this specific spot is still visible.With no signs of a D or S...
Pictures of the coin would help greatly,both obverse and reverse before going any further.
Yes you are partially correct the copper nickel versions have the mint marks on the right side of Monticello and for Philly no mint mark at...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Your right my eyes must've skipped over Philly and just saw the(S)&(W).But as I stated above your coin isn't silver or the reverse proof...
Not silver or reverse proof the last time Philly dimes were silver proofs was 1964 so impossible for yours to be silver.Your coin is a normal...
By your pictures it makes the coin look gold plated.Not sure if it's a die clash,can't find an overlay for this design.
Definitely fake and also think why is such a coin not certified at this level?an obvious clue.
Just a little to worn for XF it's a high end VF 35 and still a nice looking Indian.[ATTACH]
I'm thinking proof it just has the look to me so PF65 RB this is a interesting one and beautiful coin.
Where do you see the rim damage?I see a nice rim cud on the obverse if that's what your reffering to.
YouTube most likely.
Also to add it was the biggest one out of the only 100 picture results it gave me.
Just imagine the stuff isn't visible:wacky::wacky:after all the picture was from a quick Google search.
Ok then it just looks so familiar to other coins with damage that looks similar to the anomaly on the coin,basically same spot also.
I'm going with damage the small pictures make it look like a strike through.But the last picture makes it look like pushed metal as if something...
Separate names with a comma.
