The second picture is a 1943 right?silver:):).
Way to low and as Paddy's expression is:rolleyes::rolleyes:(are you joking!!) more like within the $30-$50 range.
Stay of off YouTube coin wise that's #1 only use legitimate numismatic websites.
Possibly just a plated coin?the overall coin appearance does look kind of odd.
No mint mark means it was minted at Philadelphia,not seeing any doubling but still 5 cents.
Not the big one ,with all the corrosion and gunk it's not worth finding out but still a cent.
RPM's have nothing to do with true double(d) dies if there's doubling on the Mint mark it's MD-machine doubling or DDD-die deterioration...
Yes,not an error still a cent.
Yes sadly a vise job,you can still try etsy:D:D.
Like the other coin DDD-die deterioration doubling,flow lines.https://www.error-ref.com/die-deterioration-promoted-by-trails/...
DDD die deterioration doubling,worn die strike the ridge ring up top is a clear indicator https://www.error-ref.com/design-devouring-die-wear/
Germans had the big guns but they lost in the long run.I've seen one of those in a museum before,the inside actually was quite big.Kind of like a...
It's in nice shape more like in the $5-$10 range.
Nope it's just strike through foreign material in general.Something got stuck onto the die when struck and then it fell off leaving the deep...
Yes I just realized 1964 D not 1960 I have a faulty memory sometimes.
Wrong date hold up.
Definitely fake,they didn't mint microscopic versions.
I agree with your statement,it should've at least left a trail of the exposed zinc core. Didn't even consider that originally(my morning brain)It...
No need to its not an RPM.DDD-die deterioration doubling as I can see it on some of the letters as well but you still have 4 bucks of silver.
Looks like damage to me,a deep long scratch.
Separate names with a comma.
