What am I missing?
If genuine, I would call it an AU-55 and put in the $400 range. The if genuine is a big if and better images would be needed to offer an opinion...
I completely agree that it shouldn't be in a problem free holder, but generally if the coin is labeled cleaned, it is because of a harsh cleaning....
I don't either, but they probably show up if the coin was at an angle or had different lighting.
Only a ten coin minimum order though.
http://www.indiancent.com/eerc_images/Top100.pdf
Just swing this thread, but I contacted him earlier as well. I felt bad for delivering the news as he really did seem like a nice honest seller...
I've purchased and returned two coins from GSC. The images are a really poor representation of the coin in hand. They don't just sell cleaned...
I know, just disappointed since it was an ANACS MS-64 before it went to NCS. It had a bit of tar looking grime on the reverse that I thought they...
Sent this one in to NCS and it came back improperly cleaned. I guess it could have been cleaned in the past though. [ATTACH]
No, I agree, I think the the AU details is correct, but it seems like the label should have said questionable color. It does have quite a bit of...
Wow, that's really bad. I hate how lax the mint has become on quality. Once upon a time they would hand carve dies, polish them, specially prepare...
Not really sure. Considering that it still shows most of the mint luster, kind of hard to say. Clearly it took a dip though. Nothing about it...
Separate names with a comma.
