[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
No manipulation other than lighting. The first shot is how it looks in hand, other shots for web. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That's a LARGE date 1970S.
63RB, seems a bit low on luster.
That's a killer coin, frosty fields, almost cameo contrast on the obverse.
CONFIRMED! :dead: lol
1928 - 64RB
Luster trumps the right, obv field distractions. 66RD
Shinny, mirror-like surfaces and the plating typically extends to the rim sides. Also, plated coins do not have cartwheel luster. On this one...
That explains a lot. I hope you didn't pay more than $2-3. This is 100% a fake, seeded roll.....and a poor seed job at that with replates on the...
Hummm....the end coins appear to be plated, too reflective.
Given the pictures, it looks like it's probably genuine. Generally, dealers know exactly what they're doing when it comes to the keys....mistakes...
That's EXACTLY what conservation is all about. I'd say you got lucky though, I would have guessed they etched the surface based on the picture.
[ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Absolutely STUNNING for the issue!
Separate names with a comma.
