[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Looks righteous to me. AU-50
Who doesn't?
Yep... https://www.cointalk.com/threads/sentimental-piece-stolen.261886/
I'd seldom say this, but this was a bath that needed to happen. That was an ugly coin if it wasn't rubbed on, it helped to preserve the coin. I...
If you didn't scrub it in any way, than it is perfectly acceptable and I think much more appealing than it was. Good results to me.
There are a couple in the eighties that have a pretty decent premium, but the 60s and 70s seems pretty easy to come by.
The value would be in the toning if it is nice enough; these are just so common in uncirculated grades that I don't see much of a premium otherwise.
Very strange looking, I'll go AU-55.
I was wondering how long that would take.
I am a fourth generation collector, so I have many coins and many duplicates. Your poll doesn't even come close to my number.
Can you post a link to the coin?
If the mint didn't sell all of the proofs that they made, they simply put them into circulation. This was a pretty standard practice in the day,...
It looks like the prime focal area hit limited the grade; 62 seems like the correct grade and is much prettier overall than most 62s of any year....
Maybe if it was the prettiest toner Franklin ever...
Collectors universe. Ahhh... Should have read your full post first. Cull?
Why do I want Taco Bell all the sudden? Was there some sort of subliminal message imbedded in this thread?
I'd really like to complete my set of proof nickels with the addition of a nice proof 1867 with rays. It's the only proof nickel besides the 1913...
Those Washington/Carvers have smashing luster. Nice pickups there and nice images to boot. I really like the Columbian though, seems fresh and...
Well fifteen bucks is cheap enough for a coin that you like. Though, the lumps themselves don't point to whizzing to me, more like a die chip or...
Separate names with a comma.
