Normal coin, worth 1 cent. Only the Wide AM (WAM) is valuable: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Just trying to confuse unknowledgeable buyers - buyers beware!
Nope, no need for it. I like the nice, original surfaces on both. All these got was an acetone rinse before putting them into Airtites.
There's no lamination. Where do you think you see one?
This other one in my collection shows the reverse die wearing. It's still pretty decent for the issue though - these are tough with any original...
Actually, for the issue, that thing is hammered. Denver was way over-using their dies. Finding examples with a well struck reverse is difficult,...
[ATTACH]
Must be a tough coin to photograph! The last in-slab picture is probably your best one because the lighting. Your other pictures gave me the idea...
62BN
Large date...keep dreaming! Notice how different the small date looks from your coin: [ATTACH]
Yeah, but with my luck it'd come back in a 67 holder! LOLOL
What do you think mine would grade? It has really strong, bright cartwheel luster and a great strike. Pictures shot through an Airtite so ignore...
Me too...and, ALWAYS show the reverse. :)
I like it as a 63. Beautiful and amazing coin!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
AU-58? [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Nope, just prefer 58's - especially toners. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here's one of my 1960D small dates, I have not even sent this one in and it's real nice with it's obverse "red" toning: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Welcome to CT! You found a nice 60-D small date. The Denver issues are NOT more valuable like the 1960P small date. There were approximately equal...
Yup, that's kind of how I call it too....but I want a 58!
Separate names with a comma.
