XF40, maybe 45. I agree with 40. And yes, been cleaned. Still, a little bit better date.
+1
You possibly just mis-typed, but I believe it's O-105. They share the reverse (E), but the points on the 1's (in the date) are small & blunt.
AU55
Looks like the luster is better in the protected areas, I'm thinking high AU. Maybe 58. Edit: guessing circulation strike..
Late, sorry...I found this comment in the Overton book, "The edges of 1833 dated half dollars usually show only slight traces of the vertical...
I believe vertical reeding between the words started in 1831 or 1832. I'll look it up tonight if no one else verifies.:)
62 here also
If they are common dates, probably not worth it unless they will grade MS65. Maybe not even then.
I was thinking low mint state, dipped at some point but some light toning now, nice coin for the grade
Needs more light to grade with confidence, but I'm thinking AU-ish.
AU50
63
Late, but I was thinking 67
Entry post. This would be a cool win. Thanks, @Eric the Red for your generosity!
First impression 64, sticking with that. Nice skin.
[ATTACH] I think I see a trace of a 4 to the left of the final four? I'm going with O-110, R.2 as the Overton, though I could be wrong...
My photos often make a coin look worse than it is. So grading from photos is just a guess based on each individuals interpretation. Honestly the...
"Silently net grading" actually is something the grading services do. I think it happened here. AU58 by wear, but it doesn't look 58.
Going by how I read the remaining luster, either 53 or 55. I chose 53.
Separate names with a comma.
