Nice. That was my guess, but I don't collect this series. Looks like the majority opinion is this is a nice one for the grade.
64 FH
Interesting. The overall brawnyness makes me think lioness, but the ears look small, and no tuft at the tails end. @expat , I was thinking...
PR65
Honestly that's terrible.
MIKELOCK34s 1813...O-109, R3 (methinks) CircCams 1821...O-106, R1 AcesKings 1821...O-103, R2 @CoinCorgi below....O-111, R3. 5 high in 50 C, C...
Or is it that the luster just doesn't look right?
45/50 range.
For better or worse, there are coins out there that small differences in grade mean big $$$. I believe that is some of what drives this.
Certainly not impossible. The services sometimes miss things, or sometimes things get a pass. This coin shows the type of in holder toning Morgans...
Looks like an Oregon gold "Beaver coin." Not at all sure it's real though. The date looks like 1349, should be 1849....if so it's likely a...
VF20, straight grade. Shrink the dime down to actual size, I think the scratch is not a huge issue at this grade.
This looks more like Liberty on an 1809 dated coin. The '07-08's look quite a bit different.
BHNC! Kudos, happy for you! :cigar::cigar::cigar::cigar:
I really don't know my rarest, but this one came to mind...Guatemala 4 Reales, mintage 7,664. [ATTACH]
What is the weight on the 1832?
Leaning they're both bad
No argument from me...I know photos often make a coin look different than in hand. Peace.
Not knocking this coin, but I don't believe it should have graded above AU55. JMO.
I'd say slightly above average strike for the date, and you definitely improved it. Does look like an old wipe, but still a decent AU-ish example.
Separate names with a comma.
