So far that one is winning the ugly contest. Yeah, you should have bought it...
AU details for all the obverse hits if nothing else. That is not your normal bag marks.
MS65RD if the graders were having a good day.
Kind of like playing softball and golf. Softball will wreck your golf swing...
AU53 and MS63BN
This thread should be interesting. I use an old Canon Rebel XS mounted to a Canon FD bellows mounted to an old repurposed microscope stand. I use...
It's not end of roll in my opinion. They tend to be toned one side and show the paper folds in the toning. it could be old album toning if...
I'm going with 65 but 66 would not shock me. Pretty Morgan Phil! :)
Exactly what I was thinking as I was reading your post..
New images all appear to be die polish lines.
I think it reaches P-01 even with obverse stars visible. This extent of wear can and will vary from coin to coin.
Solid 65 for me. New images posted while I was posting changes my opinion to 64+
Good eye. I see the gouge in the bonnet fold. ;)
I was wondering if you were trying to Tom Sawyer us into VAMming it.
I agree with Doug. The lines through LIBERTY appear to be in the die. The lines on the date side do not (at least from the images)
I'm usually or....:)
I'm going out on a limb and say that have it at MS64 UDM
Absolutely superb post. You had me riveted to my monitor reading all of it. :)
Yeah, I was afraid you had me pegged as a grammar cop. That would be the pot calling the kettle black....
I just moved the word "much" to in front of "lower grade" is all. I'm willing to bet it's closer to 63/64 than 69. And I agree, double negs are...
Separate names with a comma.
