I don't think anyone knows for sure the answer to this question.
63 rb?
I honestly thought the same thing, but think what you're looking at is stacking friction -- as the coin is too "clean" to be AU in my eyes.......
I will presume, given the choices, that the coin graded *, but I gotta tell you that if NGC gives out stars for every morgan toned like this,...
No, we can't all agree. ;)
p.s. nice avatar!
The coin has the appearance of one that has come into contact with soap (as in a washing machine or MS 70 -- more likely the former than the latter).
Stunning photos!
How's the luster? Looks clean enough for a 65, but I wonder if a lack of luster (or rims) hasn't held this coin back to a 64 (which is what I...
I'm sorry to hear of your troubles. I have reported the auction. FYI, I would never buy a coin from high-volume seller with less than a 99.9%...
Au 55
p.s. like busties too. :)
The heck with those big ugly sliver coins... ;) Nice 1846! :D
More crappy pics! ;) Ms 62 bn LOOK AT THE LUSTER!
MS 62 (or 63). This is a toughie though -- really like to see bigger pics.
I hope the coin is graded 55 or 58, but suspect it is in an MS holder. That said, I don't look at or follow these coins closely, so the above is...
Looks like a solid 65 to my eye, but the pics aren't big enough to be sure. So I'm going to guess Zaneman has found a PQ 64. ;)
Solid VF
Hi Chris. VF (or even low-end XF) seems about right, detail wise. While some are prooflike, I'm concerned with a lack of luster -- the coin...
p.s. to answer your question, yes, I do have a few AT/QT coins in albums.
Separate names with a comma.
